O
Montgomery County
← Community
DevelopmentCommunity discussion

Bill 41-26

Montgomery County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
7

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedKen Hartman EspadaOct 6, 2026

Testifying for County Executive Elrich, he urged keeping the owner-occupancy requirement with only a limited temporary waiver, warning investors could buy homes as dual rentals.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:39:14 →
OpposedDebbie HellerOct 6, 2026

The Somerset town council president warned removing owner-occupancy turns ADU homes into absentee two-unit investment properties and squeezes out first-time buyers.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:41:30 →
OpposedCheryl GannonOct 6, 2026

For the Civic Federation, she cited the 2019 promise of 'no absentee landlords' and urged the council to reject the bill and fund ADU construction incentives instead.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:44:40 →
SupportiveSusan GallagherOct 6, 2026

She supported the bill but urged going further: drop the two-adult limit, create pre-approved ADU plans, and block HOA bans on ADUs.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:47:44 →
OpposedLeanne TobiasOct 6, 2026

Representing Friendship Heights communities, she cited a Philadelphia Fed study showing investors raise rents faster and outbid families, urging the requirement be kept.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:51:14 →
SupportiveDan ReedOct 6, 2026

The Greater Greater Washington policy director strongly supported removal, noting House Bill 1466 requires Maryland jurisdictions to ease ADU restrictions.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:54:30 →
SupportiveJake WoodmanOct 6, 2026

A Montgomery for All advocate called ADUs a practical affordability tool, drawing on his own experience living in one during the pandemic.

Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:57:12 →