Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Removing the ADU owner-occupancy rule (Bill 41-26)→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 7
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Testifying for County Executive Elrich, he urged keeping the owner-occupancy requirement with only a limited temporary waiver, warning investors could buy homes as dual rentals.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:39:14 →The Somerset town council president warned removing owner-occupancy turns ADU homes into absentee two-unit investment properties and squeezes out first-time buyers.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:41:30 →For the Civic Federation, she cited the 2019 promise of 'no absentee landlords' and urged the council to reject the bill and fund ADU construction incentives instead.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:44:40 →She supported the bill but urged going further: drop the two-adult limit, create pre-approved ADU plans, and block HOA bans on ADUs.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:47:44 →Representing Friendship Heights communities, she cited a Philadelphia Fed study showing investors raise rents faster and outbid families, urging the requirement be kept.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:51:14 →The Greater Greater Washington policy director strongly supported removal, noting House Bill 1466 requires Maryland jurisdictions to ease ADU restrictions.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:54:30 →A Montgomery for All advocate called ADUs a practical affordability tool, drawing on his own experience living in one during the pandemic.
Council Session - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:57:12 →