O
Montgomery County
← Community
RoadsCommunity discussion

SRA 26-01 — Continuation of roads

Montgomery County

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (6)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 9, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveNancy StarkJun 9, 2026

Hillendale Citizens Association president supported the SRA, describing how 110 townhouses' traffic would overwhelm narrow neighborhood streets near two schools.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:38:09 →
OpposedFrancoise CarrierJun 9, 2026

Attorney for the Amalgamated Transit Union (property owner) urged rejection, warning the SRA could make the 46-acre redevelopment unbuildable.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:41:24 →
SupportiveLarry TaubJun 9, 2026

A 42-year Hillendale resident argued the SRA is consistent with the master plan's tree-buffer recommendations and asked for support.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:44:25 →
SupportiveJeff GenserJun 9, 2026

Longtime resident supported the SRA, recounting a developer's statements about widening Royal Road and warning the neighborhood would otherwise be 'destroyed.'

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:48:02 →
SupportiveVernon RudeJun 9, 2026

Argued the developer should pay for a $5 million bridge over the stream instead of routing traffic through the neighborhood.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:51:06 →
SupportiveRobin GardnerJun 9, 2026

A 39-year resident described the neighborhood's narrow streets and asked the council to pass the bill to prevent the community becoming a pass-through.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:54:08 →
SupportiveAnn PerryJun 9, 2026

Warned of cut-through traffic on Lariston Lane, poor visibility at Cresthaven and New Hampshire, and danger to pedestrians near two schools.

Council Session - Jun 9, 2026 · 2:56:40 →